Franchise Facts Report → compare → Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) vs Pop-A-Lock
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) vs Pop-A-Lock
Two home services franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.
| Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) | Pop-A-Lock | |
|---|---|---|
| Total initial investment FDD Item 7 | $101,740 – $132,490 | $137,777 – $170,822 |
| Initial franchise fee FDD Item 5 | $58,500 | $43,000 |
| Royalty FDD Item 6 | 7% | 7% |
| Item 19 earnings disclosed FDD Item 19 | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Avg unit revenue (headline) FDD Item 19 | $323,335 | — |
| Franchised outlets FDD Item 20 | 445 | 426 |
| Net outlet change (latest yr) FDD Item 20 | -30 | -8 |
| Closure rate FDD Item 20 | 7.6% | 2.3% |
| Franchisee lawsuits FDD Item 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Risk level our read | Medium | Medium |
| FDD year registration | 2025 | 2025 |
Are Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) and Pop-A-Lock the same company?
No — Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) and Pop-A-Lock are franchised by separate companies. Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory)'s franchisor is Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory); Pop-A-Lock's is SystemForward America, LLC a Louisiana Limited Liability Company (Pop-A-Lock). Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
Cost to open
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $101,740 – $132,490, against $137,777 – $170,822 for Pop-A-Lock.
How much does each make? (Item 19)
Only Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $323,335), while Pop-A-Lock's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Closures & failure rate
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) reports 445 franchised outlets, net change -30 in the latest reported year, a 7.6% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Pop-A-Lock reports 426 franchised outlets, net change -8 in the latest reported year, a 2.3% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against home services medians.
Litigation
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) discloses 1 franchisee-vs-franchisor proceeding in FDD Item 3. Pop-A-Lock discloses no franchisee-initiated proceedings in FDD Item 3.
This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against home services peers.
Only looking at one of them?
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) vs Pop-A-Lock — frequently asked
Are Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) and Pop-A-Lock the same company?
No — Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) and Pop-A-Lock are franchised by separate companies. Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory)'s franchisor is Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory); Pop-A-Lock's is SystemForward America, LLC a Louisiana Limited Liability Company (Pop-A-Lock). Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
What is the difference between Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) and Pop-A-Lock?
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) and Pop-A-Lock are home services franchises from different franchisors (Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) and SystemForward America, LLC a Louisiana Limited Liability Company (Pop-A-Lock)). Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $101,740 – $132,490, against $137,777 – $170,822 for Pop-A-Lock. Only Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $323,335), while Pop-A-Lock's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Is Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) more profitable than Pop-A-Lock?
Only Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $323,335), while Pop-A-Lock's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Which is cheaper to open — Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) or Pop-A-Lock?
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $101,740 – $132,490, against $137,777 – $170,822 for Pop-A-Lock.
Is Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) or Pop-A-Lock growing faster?
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) reports 445 franchised outlets, net change -30 in the latest reported year, a 7.6% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Pop-A-Lock reports 426 franchised outlets, net change -8 in the latest reported year, a 2.3% closure rate (FDD Item 20).
Go deeper on each brand
Home services rankings
Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Pillar To Post, Inc. (Non Exclusive Territory) 2025, Pop-A-Lock 2025). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.