Franchise Facts Report

Franchise Facts Reportcompare → Stand Strong Fencing vs Sam the Concrete Man

Stand Strong Fencing vs Sam the Concrete Man

Home services · head-to-head from each brand's most recent FDD

Two home services franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.

Stand Strong FencingSam the Concrete Man
Total initial investment
FDD Item 7
$160,181 – $241,071 $92,149 – $145,993
Initial franchise fee
FDD Item 5
$5,000 $67,000
Royalty
FDD Item 6
6% 6%
Item 19 earnings disclosed
FDD Item 19
Yes Yes
Avg unit revenue (headline)
FDD Item 19
$1,293,473 $995,043
Franchised outlets
FDD Item 20
126 81
Net outlet change (latest yr)
FDD Item 20
+116 +17
Closure rate
FDD Item 20
7.8%
Franchisee lawsuits
FDD Item 3
disclosed 0
Risk level
our read
Low Low
FDD year
registration
2025 2025

Are Stand Strong Fencing and Sam the Concrete Man the same company?

No — Stand Strong Fencing and Sam the Concrete Man are franchised by separate companies. Stand Strong Fencing's franchisor is HPB Fencing LLC; Sam the Concrete Man's is SAMCO LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

Cost to open

Sam the Concrete Man is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $92,149 – $145,993, against $160,181 – $241,071 for Stand Strong Fencing.

How much does each make? (Item 19)

Both franchisors make an Item 19 financial performance representation. On the headline average unit revenue each discloses, Stand Strong Fencing reports the higher figure ($1,293,473 vs $995,043). Revenue is not profit — the full report breaks out what each brand actually represents.

Closures & failure rate

Stand Strong Fencing reports 126 franchised outlets, net change +116 in the latest reported year (FDD Item 20). Sam the Concrete Man reports 81 franchised outlets, net change +17 in the latest reported year, a 7.8% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against home services medians.

Litigation

Stand Strong Fencing discloses litigation in FDD Item 3 (case detail in the full report). Sam the Concrete Man discloses no franchisee-initiated proceedings in FDD Item 3.

The full side-by-side — $249

This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against home services peers.

How the report works

Only looking at one of them?

Stand Strong Fencing vs Sam the Concrete Man — frequently asked

Are Stand Strong Fencing and Sam the Concrete Man the same company?

No — Stand Strong Fencing and Sam the Concrete Man are franchised by separate companies. Stand Strong Fencing's franchisor is HPB Fencing LLC; Sam the Concrete Man's is SAMCO LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

What is the difference between Stand Strong Fencing and Sam the Concrete Man?

Stand Strong Fencing and Sam the Concrete Man are home services franchises from different franchisors (HPB Fencing LLC and SAMCO LLC). Sam the Concrete Man is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $92,149 – $145,993, against $160,181 – $241,071 for Stand Strong Fencing. Both franchisors make an Item 19 financial performance representation. On the headline average unit revenue each discloses, Stand Strong Fencing reports the higher figure ($1,293,473 vs $995,043). Revenue is not profit — the full report breaks out what each brand actually represents.

Is Stand Strong Fencing more profitable than Sam the Concrete Man?

Both franchisors make an Item 19 financial performance representation. On the headline average unit revenue each discloses, Stand Strong Fencing reports the higher figure ($1,293,473 vs $995,043). Revenue is not profit — the full report breaks out what each brand actually represents.

Which is cheaper to open — Stand Strong Fencing or Sam the Concrete Man?

Sam the Concrete Man is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $92,149 – $145,993, against $160,181 – $241,071 for Stand Strong Fencing.

Is Stand Strong Fencing or Sam the Concrete Man growing faster?

Stand Strong Fencing reports 126 franchised outlets, net change +116 in the latest reported year (FDD Item 20). Sam the Concrete Man reports 81 franchised outlets, net change +17 in the latest reported year, a 7.8% closure rate (FDD Item 20).

Go deeper on each brand

Stand Strong Fencing franchise facts$160,181 – $241,071 · low risk Sam the Concrete Man franchise facts$92,149 – $145,993 · low risk

Home services rankings

Best home services & home improvement franchises by the FDD numbersCheapest home services & home improvement franchises to openFastest-growing home services & home improvement franchisesHome services & home improvement franchises ranked by average revenueHome services & home improvement franchises with disclosed Item 19 earningsHome services & home improvement franchises with the most franchisee lawsuitsLowest-churn home services & home improvement franchisesLowest-royalty home services & home improvement franchises

Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Stand Strong Fencing 2025, Sam the Concrete Man 2025). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.

This report compiles and structures publicly filed Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) data from state franchise registrations. It is not legal, financial, or investment advice, is not affiliated with or endorsed by any franchisor, and does not replace reading the full FDD or consulting a franchise attorney or accountant. All figures are as disclosed by the franchisor in its most recent registered FDD. Item 19 financial performance representations are made at the franchisor’s option and may be absent or limited.