Franchise Facts Report

Franchise Facts Reportcompare → Supercuts vs Cost Cutters

Supercuts vs Cost Cutters

Beauty & personal care · head-to-head from each brand's most recent FDD

Two beauty & personal care franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.

SupercutsCost Cutters
Total initial investment
FDD Item 7
$185,930 – $323,460 $180,990 – $342,340
Initial franchise fee
FDD Item 5
$39,500
Royalty
FDD Item 6
4% 6%
Item 19 earnings disclosed
FDD Item 19
Yes Yes
Avg unit revenue (headline)
FDD Item 19
$1,199,963 $1,144,397
Franchised outlets
FDD Item 20
1,701 329
Net outlet change (latest yr)
FDD Item 20
-234 -134
Closure rate
FDD Item 20
7.1% 8.9%
Franchisee lawsuits
FDD Item 3
9 disclosed
Risk level
our read
High Medium
FDD year
registration
2025 2025

Are Supercuts and Cost Cutters the same company?

No — Supercuts and Cost Cutters are franchised by separate companies. Supercuts's franchisor is SUPERCUTS, INC.; Cost Cutters's is THE BARBERS, HAIRSTYLING FOR MEN & WOMEN, INC.. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

Cost to open

Supercuts is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $185,930 – $323,460, against $180,990 – $342,340 for Cost Cutters.

How much does each make? (Item 19)

Both franchisors make an Item 19 financial performance representation. On the headline average unit revenue each discloses, Supercuts reports the higher figure ($1,199,963 vs $1,144,397). Revenue is not profit — the full report breaks out what each brand actually represents.

Closures & failure rate

Supercuts reports 1,701 franchised outlets, net change -234 in the latest reported year, a 7.1% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Cost Cutters reports 329 franchised outlets, net change -134 in the latest reported year, a 8.9% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against beauty & personal care medians.

Litigation

Supercuts discloses 9 franchisee-vs-franchisor proceedings in FDD Item 3. Cost Cutters discloses litigation in FDD Item 3 (case detail in the full report).

The full side-by-side — $249

This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against beauty & personal care peers.

How the report works

Only looking at one of them?

Supercuts vs Cost Cutters — frequently asked

Are Supercuts and Cost Cutters the same company?

No — Supercuts and Cost Cutters are franchised by separate companies. Supercuts's franchisor is SUPERCUTS, INC.; Cost Cutters's is THE BARBERS, HAIRSTYLING FOR MEN & WOMEN, INC.. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

What is the difference between Supercuts and Cost Cutters?

Supercuts and Cost Cutters are beauty & personal care franchises from different franchisors (SUPERCUTS, INC. and THE BARBERS, HAIRSTYLING FOR MEN & WOMEN, INC.). Supercuts is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $185,930 – $323,460, against $180,990 – $342,340 for Cost Cutters. Both franchisors make an Item 19 financial performance representation. On the headline average unit revenue each discloses, Supercuts reports the higher figure ($1,199,963 vs $1,144,397). Revenue is not profit — the full report breaks out what each brand actually represents.

Is Supercuts more profitable than Cost Cutters?

Both franchisors make an Item 19 financial performance representation. On the headline average unit revenue each discloses, Supercuts reports the higher figure ($1,199,963 vs $1,144,397). Revenue is not profit — the full report breaks out what each brand actually represents.

Which is cheaper to open — Supercuts or Cost Cutters?

Supercuts is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $185,930 – $323,460, against $180,990 – $342,340 for Cost Cutters.

Is Supercuts or Cost Cutters growing faster?

Supercuts reports 1,701 franchised outlets, net change -234 in the latest reported year, a 7.1% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Cost Cutters reports 329 franchised outlets, net change -134 in the latest reported year, a 8.9% closure rate (FDD Item 20).

Go deeper on each brand

Supercuts franchise facts$185,930 – $323,460 · high risk Cost Cutters franchise facts$180,990 – $342,340 · medium risk

Beauty & personal care rankings

Best salon, beauty & personal care franchises by the FDD numbersCheapest salon, beauty & personal care franchises to openFastest-growing salon, beauty & personal care franchisesLowest-churn salon, beauty & personal care franchisesLowest-royalty salon, beauty & personal care franchisesSalon, beauty & personal care franchises ranked by average revenueSalon, beauty & personal care franchises with disclosed Item 19 earningsSalon, beauty & personal care franchises with the most franchisee lawsuits

Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Supercuts 2025, Cost Cutters 2025). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.

This report compiles and structures publicly filed Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) data from state franchise registrations. It is not legal, financial, or investment advice, is not affiliated with or endorsed by any franchisor, and does not replace reading the full FDD or consulting a franchise attorney or accountant. All figures are as disclosed by the franchisor in its most recent registered FDD. Item 19 financial performance representations are made at the franchisor’s option and may be absent or limited.