Franchise Facts Report

Franchise Facts Reportbrands → ON+ON | On+On

ON+ON | On+On franchise — is it worth it?

Quick-service restaurant · FDD-based assessment · registered 2024

Risk level — in the report

ON+ON is a quick-service restaurant franchise with a relatively low initial investment range of $278,000 to $471,000.

Get the full report — $99what's inside ↓
Total initial investment
$278,000 – $471,000
Top quartile for quick-service restaurant · median $555,750
Initial franchise fee
$30,000
FDD Item 5
Royalty
5%
FDD Item 6
Item 19 earnings
Not disclosed
no franchisor earnings
Litigation (Item 3)
None
none disclosed
Outlet network
2 units
+1 last year
The full ON+ON | On+On report — $99

Unlock what the free page above only hints at:

Compare 3 brands — $249 See a sample report

Figures above are as disclosed in ON+ON | On+On's most recent FDD (registered 2024). Source: California Dept. of Financial Protection and Innovation — Franchise Registration · filing app-30564. The risk level, the Item 19 figures, how it compares to peers, and the litigation & churn detail are in the full report.

ON+ON | On+On franchise profit — what the FDD discloses

Plainly: ON+ON | On+On does not disclose franchise profit or revenue. Its most recent FDD makes no Item 19 financial performance representation, so there is no franchisor-backed earnings figure for ON+ON | On+On — any number quoted elsewhere is an estimate, not a disclosure. The absence is itself worth weighing (many quick-service restaurant franchisors do disclose), and the full report reads the risk signals ON+ON | On+On's FDD does contain — fees, litigation, and outlet churn — against peers. For brands that put earnings on paper, see Fast food & quick-service restaurant franchises with disclosed Item 19 earnings.

ON+ON | On+On lawsuits & legal history (FDD Item 3)

ON+ON | On+On's most recently filed Franchise Disclosure Document (2024) discloses no litigation in Item 3. That is a real signal rather than a gap: the FTC Franchise Rule requires a franchisor to disclose material litigation involving itself, its predecessors, parents, affiliates and management, so an empty Item 3 in a current filing means there was nothing it was required to report. It is worth reading alongside the churn numbers — a system can have a clean Item 3 and still be losing franchisees, which is what Item 20 shows.

ON+ON | On+On closures & failure rate

Before you sign, ON+ON | On+On will hand you a list of current owners to call as references — and they choose who's on that list. It won't include the owners who quit, got bought out, or were forced out last year. The FDD does report that number, even though the reference list leaves those people off. Below is what ON+ON | On+On's most recent filing shows, and whether it's normal for a quick-service restaurant of this kind.

The closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate is Item 20 — outlet openings, closures, terminations and non-renewals, reported by the franchisor. ON+ON | On+On's latest tables show a growing franchised network. The actual closure and termination counts, and how ON+ON | On+On's churn ranks against quick-service restaurant peers, are in the full report.

The full ON+ON | On+On report — $99

The risk & red-flag breakdown, every figure ranked against quick-service restaurant peers, litigation and churn detail — emailed as a PDF.

Who owns ON+ON | On+On?

ON+ON | On+On's franchise is offered by On and On Franchise, Inc. — the franchisor named on the cover of its most recently filed Franchise Disclosure Document (2024), and the entity a franchisee actually signs with. That name comes straight off the filing at CA DFPI; it identifies the franchisor, not necessarily the ultimate parent company behind it.

Quick-service restaurant franchises at a similar investment level

Anyone weighing ON+ON | On+On is really weighing it against the other brands their money could go into. These are the closest by total initial investment (FDD Item 7), each with its own FDD-based page.

Pablito's Tacos$219,500 – $447,000 · Item 19 disclosedOH K-Dog & Egg Toast$131,750 – $548,500Squeeze In Franchising, L.L.C. (Unit)$201,893 – $521,870 · Item 19 disclosedbb.q Chicken | bb.q Chicken Bistro$275,000 – $453,000Seniore's Pizza$297,000 – $455,500Fazoli's$270,000 – $485,000 · Item 19 disclosedIke's, the$141,300 – $614,000 · Item 19 disclosedWestside Pizza$207,435 – $559,935 · Item 19 disclosedTulsi$239,000 – $534,333 · Item 19 disclosedSubway$238,623 – $536,745PAIK'S NOODLE | Paik's Noodle$349,000 – $474,000Oke Poke$273,900 – $752,800 · Item 19 disclosed

ON+ON | On+On franchise — frequently asked

Who owns ON+ON | On+On — who is the franchisor?

ON+ON | On+On's most recently filed FDD (2024) names On and On Franchise, Inc. as the franchisor — the entity you would actually sign the franchise agreement with, as stated on the disclosure document itself. A registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent company.

How much does a ON+ON | On+On franchise cost?

ON+ON | On+On's most recently filed FDD (Item 7) puts the total estimated initial investment at $278,000 – $471,000, with an initial franchise fee of $30,000 and a 5% royalty. That price is the franchisor's own estimate of what it takes to open, not a quote. The full report breaks down every fee line and benchmarks it against quick-service restaurant peers.

How much profit does a ON+ON | On+On franchise make?

ON+ON | On+On makes no Item 19 financial performance representation, so there is no franchisor-disclosed revenue or profit figure for ON+ON | On+On at all — and profit would never be disclosed even where earnings are, because it depends on your rent, labour and how you operate. Any profit figure quoted elsewhere is an estimate, not a disclosure.

Does ON+ON | On+On disclose financial performance (Item 19)?

No — ON+ON | On+On's most recent FDD makes no Item 19 financial performance representation. Its absence is worth weighing; the report focuses on the verifiable risk signals instead.

Are there lawsuits against ON+ON | On+On?

No — ON+ON | On+On's most recently filed FDD (2024) discloses no litigation in Item 3. Franchisors must disclose material litigation involving themselves, their predecessors, parents, affiliates and management, so an empty Item 3 is a genuine signal rather than an omission.

Is ON+ON | On+On a good franchise to buy?

That comes down to how ON+ON | On+On's investment, earnings, litigation and franchisee churn stack up against quick-service restaurant peers — which is exactly what the full report answers. For $99 you get the risk level and what's driving it, the actual Item 19 earnings (absent from this FDD), where every figure ranks against peers, and the specific questions to ask the franchisor before you sign.

Decide with the numbers — $99

Everything the sections above point to, in one place: ON+ON | On+On's risk level and what's driving it, what the missing Item 19 earnings imply, every figure ranked against quick-service restaurant peers, and the litigation & churn detail — with the questions to put to the franchisor before you sign.

Compare 3 brands — $249
Not ready to spend $99 yet?

Get a free email when something changes on ON+ON | On+On or quick-service restaurant: a new FDD registration, a new lawsuit, an outlet count that shifts, or Item 19 earnings going from undisclosed to disclosed. Pulled straight from the same registries every report is built on.

This report compiles and structures publicly filed Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) data from state franchise registrations. It is not legal, financial, or investment advice, is not affiliated with or endorsed by any franchisor, and does not replace reading the full FDD or consulting a franchise attorney or accountant. All figures are as disclosed by the franchisor in its most recent registered FDD. Item 19 financial performance representations are made at the franchisor’s option and may be absent or limited.