Franchise Facts Report → compare → KFC (traditional) vs Little Caesars
KFC (traditional) vs Little Caesars
Two quick-service restaurant franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.
| KFC (traditional) | Little Caesars | |
|---|---|---|
| Total initial investment FDD Item 7 | $135,000 – $540,000 | $393,000 – $1,728,700 |
| Initial franchise fee FDD Item 5 | $45,000 | $20,000 |
| Royalty FDD Item 6 | 4% | 6% |
| Item 19 earnings disclosed FDD Item 19 | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Avg unit revenue (headline) FDD Item 19 | $1,453,255 | — |
| Franchised outlets FDD Item 20 | 3,715 | 3,601 |
| Net outlet change (latest yr) FDD Item 20 | -127 | -26 |
| Closure rate FDD Item 20 | 4.1% | 2% |
| Franchisee lawsuits FDD Item 3 | 1 | disclosed |
| Risk level our read | Medium | High |
| FDD year registration | 2024 | 2024 |
Are KFC (traditional) and Little Caesars the same company?
No — KFC (traditional) and Little Caesars are franchised by separate companies. KFC (traditional)'s franchisor is KFC US, LLC; Little Caesars's is Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
Cost to open
KFC (traditional) is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $135,000 – $540,000, against $393,000 – $1,728,700 for Little Caesars.
How much does each make? (Item 19)
Only KFC (traditional) disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $1,453,255), while Little Caesars's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Closures & failure rate
KFC (traditional) reports 3,715 franchised outlets, net change -127 in the latest reported year, a 4.1% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Little Caesars reports 3,601 franchised outlets, net change -26 in the latest reported year, a 2% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against quick-service restaurant medians.
Litigation
KFC (traditional) discloses 1 franchisee-vs-franchisor proceeding in FDD Item 3. Little Caesars discloses litigation in FDD Item 3 (case detail in the full report).
This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against quick-service restaurant peers.
Only looking at one of them?
KFC (traditional) vs Little Caesars — frequently asked
Are KFC (traditional) and Little Caesars the same company?
No — KFC (traditional) and Little Caesars are franchised by separate companies. KFC (traditional)'s franchisor is KFC US, LLC; Little Caesars's is Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
What is the difference between KFC (traditional) and Little Caesars?
KFC (traditional) and Little Caesars are quick-service restaurant franchises from different franchisors (KFC US, LLC and Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.). KFC (traditional) is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $135,000 – $540,000, against $393,000 – $1,728,700 for Little Caesars. Only KFC (traditional) disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $1,453,255), while Little Caesars's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Is KFC (traditional) more profitable than Little Caesars?
Only KFC (traditional) disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $1,453,255), while Little Caesars's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Which is cheaper to open — KFC (traditional) or Little Caesars?
KFC (traditional) is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $135,000 – $540,000, against $393,000 – $1,728,700 for Little Caesars.
Is KFC (traditional) or Little Caesars growing faster?
KFC (traditional) reports 3,715 franchised outlets, net change -127 in the latest reported year, a 4.1% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Little Caesars reports 3,601 franchised outlets, net change -26 in the latest reported year, a 2% closure rate (FDD Item 20).
Go deeper on each brand
Quick-service restaurant rankings
Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (KFC (traditional) 2024, Little Caesars 2024). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.