Franchise Facts Report → compare → Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) vs Koala Insulation
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) vs Koala Insulation
Two home services franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.
| Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) | Koala Insulation | |
|---|---|---|
| Total initial investment FDD Item 7 | $65,560 – $78,235 | $183,807 – $234,272 |
| Initial franchise fee FDD Item 5 | $45,900 | $49,500 |
| Royalty FDD Item 6 | 7% | 6.5% |
| Item 19 earnings disclosed FDD Item 19 | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Avg unit revenue (headline) FDD Item 19 | — | in report |
| Franchised outlets FDD Item 20 | 475 | 395 |
| Net outlet change (latest yr) FDD Item 20 | -10 | +10 |
| Closure rate FDD Item 20 | 7.2% | 12.5% |
| Franchisee lawsuits FDD Item 3 | 5 | 0 |
| Risk level our read | High | Low |
| FDD year registration | 2024 | 2026 |
Are Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) and Koala Insulation the same company?
No — Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) and Koala Insulation are franchised by separate companies. Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory)'s franchisor is Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory); Koala Insulation's is Koala Insulation Franchisor, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
Cost to open
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $65,560 – $78,235, against $183,807 – $234,272 for Koala Insulation.
How much does each make? (Item 19)
Only Koala Insulation disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation, while Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory)'s most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Closures & failure rate
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) reports 475 franchised outlets, net change -10 in the latest reported year, a 7.2% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Koala Insulation reports 395 franchised outlets, net change +10 in the latest reported year, a 12.5% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against home services medians.
Litigation
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) discloses 5 franchisee-vs-franchisor proceedings in FDD Item 3. Koala Insulation discloses no franchisee-initiated proceedings in FDD Item 3.
This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against home services peers.
Only looking at one of them?
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) vs Koala Insulation — frequently asked
Are Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) and Koala Insulation the same company?
No — Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) and Koala Insulation are franchised by separate companies. Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory)'s franchisor is Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory); Koala Insulation's is Koala Insulation Franchisor, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
What is the difference between Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) and Koala Insulation?
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) and Koala Insulation are home services franchises from different franchisors (Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) and Koala Insulation Franchisor, LLC). Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $65,560 – $78,235, against $183,807 – $234,272 for Koala Insulation. Only Koala Insulation disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation, while Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory)'s most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Is Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) more profitable than Koala Insulation?
Only Koala Insulation disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation, while Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory)'s most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Which is cheaper to open — Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) or Koala Insulation?
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $65,560 – $78,235, against $183,807 – $234,272 for Koala Insulation.
Is Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) or Koala Insulation growing faster?
Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) reports 475 franchised outlets, net change -10 in the latest reported year, a 7.2% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Koala Insulation reports 395 franchised outlets, net change +10 in the latest reported year, a 12.5% closure rate (FDD Item 20).
Go deeper on each brand
Home services rankings
Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Pillar To Post, Inc. (Exclusive Territory) 2024, Koala Insulation 2026). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.