Franchise Facts Report → compare → Pop-A-Lock vs Koala Insulation
Pop-A-Lock vs Koala Insulation
Two home services franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.
| Pop-A-Lock | Koala Insulation | |
|---|---|---|
| Total initial investment FDD Item 7 | $137,777 – $170,822 | $183,807 – $234,272 |
| Initial franchise fee FDD Item 5 | $43,000 | $49,500 |
| Royalty FDD Item 6 | 7% | 6.5% |
| Item 19 earnings disclosed FDD Item 19 | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Avg unit revenue (headline) FDD Item 19 | — | in report |
| Franchised outlets FDD Item 20 | 426 | 395 |
| Net outlet change (latest yr) FDD Item 20 | -8 | +10 |
| Closure rate FDD Item 20 | 2.3% | 12.5% |
| Franchisee lawsuits FDD Item 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Risk level our read | Medium | Low |
| FDD year registration | 2025 | 2026 |
Are Pop-A-Lock and Koala Insulation the same company?
No — Pop-A-Lock and Koala Insulation are franchised by separate companies. Pop-A-Lock's franchisor is SystemForward America, LLC a Louisiana Limited Liability Company (Pop-A-Lock); Koala Insulation's is Koala Insulation Franchisor, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
Cost to open
Pop-A-Lock is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $137,777 – $170,822, against $183,807 – $234,272 for Koala Insulation.
How much does each make? (Item 19)
Only Koala Insulation disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation, while Pop-A-Lock's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Closures & failure rate
Pop-A-Lock reports 426 franchised outlets, net change -8 in the latest reported year, a 2.3% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Koala Insulation reports 395 franchised outlets, net change +10 in the latest reported year, a 12.5% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against home services medians.
Litigation
Pop-A-Lock discloses no franchisee-initiated proceedings in FDD Item 3. Koala Insulation discloses no franchisee-initiated proceedings in FDD Item 3.
This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against home services peers.
Only looking at one of them?
Pop-A-Lock vs Koala Insulation — frequently asked
Are Pop-A-Lock and Koala Insulation the same company?
No — Pop-A-Lock and Koala Insulation are franchised by separate companies. Pop-A-Lock's franchisor is SystemForward America, LLC a Louisiana Limited Liability Company (Pop-A-Lock); Koala Insulation's is Koala Insulation Franchisor, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
What is the difference between Pop-A-Lock and Koala Insulation?
Pop-A-Lock and Koala Insulation are home services franchises from different franchisors (SystemForward America, LLC a Louisiana Limited Liability Company (Pop-A-Lock) and Koala Insulation Franchisor, LLC). Pop-A-Lock is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $137,777 – $170,822, against $183,807 – $234,272 for Koala Insulation. Only Koala Insulation disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation, while Pop-A-Lock's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Is Pop-A-Lock more profitable than Koala Insulation?
Only Koala Insulation disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation, while Pop-A-Lock's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Which is cheaper to open — Pop-A-Lock or Koala Insulation?
Pop-A-Lock is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $137,777 – $170,822, against $183,807 – $234,272 for Koala Insulation.
Is Pop-A-Lock or Koala Insulation growing faster?
Pop-A-Lock reports 426 franchised outlets, net change -8 in the latest reported year, a 2.3% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Koala Insulation reports 395 franchised outlets, net change +10 in the latest reported year, a 12.5% closure rate (FDD Item 20).
Go deeper on each brand
Home services rankings
Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Pop-A-Lock 2025, Koala Insulation 2026). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.