Franchise Facts Report

Franchise Facts Reportcompare → Smartstyle vs Cost Cutters

Smartstyle vs Cost Cutters

Beauty & personal care · head-to-head from each brand's most recent FDD

Two beauty & personal care franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.

SmartstyleCost Cutters
Total initial investment
FDD Item 7
$184,440 – $336,340 $180,990 – $342,340
Initial franchise fee
FDD Item 5
$39,500 $39,500
Royalty
FDD Item 6
6%
Item 19 earnings disclosed
FDD Item 19
Not disclosed Yes
Avg unit revenue (headline)
FDD Item 19
$1,144,397
Franchised outlets
FDD Item 20
911 329
Net outlet change (latest yr)
FDD Item 20
-166 -134
Closure rate
FDD Item 20
4.3% 8.9%
Franchisee lawsuits
FDD Item 3
disclosed disclosed
Risk level
our read
High Medium
FDD year
registration
2025 2025

Are Smartstyle and Cost Cutters the same company?

Yes — for franchising purposes they are the same company. THE BARBERS, HAIRSTYLING FOR MEN & WOMEN, INC. is named as the franchisor on the most recent FDD for both Smartstyle and Cost Cutters, so you would sign your franchise agreement with the same entity either way. They remain two separate offerings with their own investment ranges, fees and outlet counts — those differences are in the table above.

Cost to open

Smartstyle is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $184,440 – $336,340, against $180,990 – $342,340 for Cost Cutters.

How much does each make? (Item 19)

Only Cost Cutters disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $1,144,397), while Smartstyle's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Closures & failure rate

Smartstyle reports 911 franchised outlets, net change -166 in the latest reported year, a 4.3% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Cost Cutters reports 329 franchised outlets, net change -134 in the latest reported year, a 8.9% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against beauty & personal care medians.

Litigation

Smartstyle discloses litigation in FDD Item 3 (case detail in the full report). Cost Cutters discloses litigation in FDD Item 3 (case detail in the full report).

The full side-by-side — $249

This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against beauty & personal care peers.

How the report works

Only looking at one of them?

Smartstyle vs Cost Cutters — frequently asked

Are Smartstyle and Cost Cutters the same company?

Yes — for franchising purposes they are the same company. THE BARBERS, HAIRSTYLING FOR MEN & WOMEN, INC. is named as the franchisor on the most recent FDD for both Smartstyle and Cost Cutters, so you would sign your franchise agreement with the same entity either way. They remain two separate offerings with their own investment ranges, fees and outlet counts — those differences are in the table above.

What is the difference between Smartstyle and Cost Cutters?

Smartstyle and Cost Cutters are two offerings from one franchisor, THE BARBERS, HAIRSTYLING FOR MEN & WOMEN, INC.. Smartstyle is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $184,440 – $336,340, against $180,990 – $342,340 for Cost Cutters. Only Cost Cutters disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $1,144,397), while Smartstyle's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Is Smartstyle more profitable than Cost Cutters?

Only Cost Cutters disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $1,144,397), while Smartstyle's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Which is cheaper to open — Smartstyle or Cost Cutters?

Smartstyle is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $184,440 – $336,340, against $180,990 – $342,340 for Cost Cutters.

Is Smartstyle or Cost Cutters growing faster?

Smartstyle reports 911 franchised outlets, net change -166 in the latest reported year, a 4.3% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Cost Cutters reports 329 franchised outlets, net change -134 in the latest reported year, a 8.9% closure rate (FDD Item 20).

Go deeper on each brand

Smartstyle franchise facts$184,440 – $336,340 · high risk Cost Cutters franchise facts$180,990 – $342,340 · medium risk

Beauty & personal care rankings

Best salon, beauty & personal care franchises by the FDD numbersCheapest salon, beauty & personal care franchises to openFastest-growing salon, beauty & personal care franchisesLowest-churn salon, beauty & personal care franchisesLowest-royalty salon, beauty & personal care franchisesSalon, beauty & personal care franchises ranked by average revenueSalon, beauty & personal care franchises with disclosed Item 19 earningsSalon, beauty & personal care franchises with the most franchisee lawsuits

Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Smartstyle 2025, Cost Cutters 2025). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.

This report compiles and structures publicly filed Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) data from state franchise registrations. It is not legal, financial, or investment advice, is not affiliated with or endorsed by any franchisor, and does not replace reading the full FDD or consulting a franchise attorney or accountant. All figures are as disclosed by the franchisor in its most recent registered FDD. Item 19 financial performance representations are made at the franchisor’s option and may be absent or limited.