Franchise Facts Report

Franchise Facts Reportcompare → Subway vs KFC (traditional)

Subway vs KFC (traditional)

Quick-service restaurant · head-to-head from each brand's most recent FDD

Two quick-service restaurant franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.

SubwayKFC (traditional)
Total initial investment
FDD Item 7
$238,623 – $536,745 $135,000 – $540,000
Initial franchise fee
FDD Item 5
$15,000 $45,000
Royalty
FDD Item 6
8% 4%
Item 19 earnings disclosed
FDD Item 19
Not disclosed Yes
Avg unit revenue (headline)
FDD Item 19
$1,453,255
Franchised outlets
FDD Item 20
20,133 3,715
Net outlet change (latest yr)
FDD Item 20
-443 -127
Closure rate
FDD Item 20
4.1%
Franchisee lawsuits
FDD Item 3
89 1
Risk level
our read
High Medium
FDD year
registration
2024 2024

Are Subway and KFC (traditional) the same company?

No — Subway and KFC (traditional) are franchised by separate companies. Subway's franchisor is Doctor's Associates LLC; KFC (traditional)'s is KFC US, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

Cost to open

KFC (traditional) is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $135,000 – $540,000, against $238,623 – $536,745 for Subway.

How much does each make? (Item 19)

Only KFC (traditional) disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $1,453,255), while Subway's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Closures & failure rate

Subway reports 20,133 franchised outlets, net change -443 in the latest reported year (FDD Item 20). KFC (traditional) reports 3,715 franchised outlets, net change -127 in the latest reported year, a 4.1% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against quick-service restaurant medians.

Litigation

Subway discloses 89 franchisee-vs-franchisor proceedings in FDD Item 3. KFC (traditional) discloses 1 franchisee-vs-franchisor proceeding in FDD Item 3.

The full side-by-side — $249

This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against quick-service restaurant peers.

How the report works

Only looking at one of them?

Subway vs KFC (traditional) — frequently asked

Are Subway and KFC (traditional) the same company?

No — Subway and KFC (traditional) are franchised by separate companies. Subway's franchisor is Doctor's Associates LLC; KFC (traditional)'s is KFC US, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

What is the difference between Subway and KFC (traditional)?

Subway and KFC (traditional) are quick-service restaurant franchises from different franchisors (Doctor's Associates LLC and KFC US, LLC). KFC (traditional) is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $135,000 – $540,000, against $238,623 – $536,745 for Subway. Only KFC (traditional) disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $1,453,255), while Subway's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Is Subway more profitable than KFC (traditional)?

Only KFC (traditional) disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $1,453,255), while Subway's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Which is cheaper to open — Subway or KFC (traditional)?

KFC (traditional) is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $135,000 – $540,000, against $238,623 – $536,745 for Subway.

Is Subway or KFC (traditional) growing faster?

Subway reports 20,133 franchised outlets, net change -443 in the latest reported year (FDD Item 20). KFC (traditional) reports 3,715 franchised outlets, net change -127 in the latest reported year, a 4.1% closure rate (FDD Item 20).

Go deeper on each brand

Subway franchise facts$238,623 – $536,745 · high risk KFC (traditional) franchise facts$135,000 – $540,000 · medium risk

Quick-service restaurant rankings

Best fast food & quick-service restaurant franchises by the FDD numbersCheapest fast food & quick-service restaurant franchises to openFast food & quick-service restaurant franchises ranked by average revenueFast food & quick-service restaurant franchises with disclosed Item 19 earningsFast food & quick-service restaurant franchises with the most franchisee lawsuitsFastest-growing fast food & quick-service restaurant franchisesLowest-churn fast food & quick-service restaurant franchisesLowest-royalty fast food & quick-service restaurant franchises

Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Subway 2024, KFC (traditional) 2024). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.

This report compiles and structures publicly filed Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) data from state franchise registrations. It is not legal, financial, or investment advice, is not affiliated with or endorsed by any franchisor, and does not replace reading the full FDD or consulting a franchise attorney or accountant. All figures are as disclosed by the franchisor in its most recent registered FDD. Item 19 financial performance representations are made at the franchisor’s option and may be absent or limited.