Franchise Facts Report

Franchise Facts Reportcompare → Ace Sushi vs Great American Cookies

Ace Sushi vs Great American Cookies

Food & beverage · head-to-head from each brand's most recent FDD

Two food & beverage franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.

Ace SushiGreat American Cookies
Total initial investment
FDD Item 7
$18,275 – $117,575 $340,500 – $462,650
Initial franchise fee
FDD Item 5
$6,000 $25,000
Royalty
FDD Item 6
6%
Item 19 earnings disclosed
FDD Item 19
Not disclosed Yes
Avg unit revenue (headline)
FDD Item 19
$539,902
Franchised outlets
FDD Item 20
423 395
Net outlet change (latest yr)
FDD Item 20
+104 -5
Closure rate
FDD Item 20
11.3% 5.8%
Franchisee lawsuits
FDD Item 3
1 disclosed
Risk level
our read
High Medium
FDD year
registration
2025 2025

Are Ace Sushi and Great American Cookies the same company?

No — Ace Sushi and Great American Cookies are franchised by separate companies. Ace Sushi's franchisor is Ace Sushi Franchise Corporation (Traditional); Great American Cookies's is GAC FRANCHISING, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

Cost to open

Ace Sushi is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $18,275 – $117,575, against $340,500 – $462,650 for Great American Cookies.

How much does each make? (Item 19)

Only Great American Cookies disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $539,902), while Ace Sushi's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Closures & failure rate

Ace Sushi reports 423 franchised outlets, net change +104 in the latest reported year, a 11.3% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Great American Cookies reports 395 franchised outlets, net change -5 in the latest reported year, a 5.8% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against food & beverage medians.

Litigation

Ace Sushi discloses 1 franchisee-vs-franchisor proceeding in FDD Item 3. Great American Cookies discloses litigation in FDD Item 3 (case detail in the full report).

The full side-by-side — $249

This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against food & beverage peers.

How the report works

Only looking at one of them?

Ace Sushi vs Great American Cookies — frequently asked

Are Ace Sushi and Great American Cookies the same company?

No — Ace Sushi and Great American Cookies are franchised by separate companies. Ace Sushi's franchisor is Ace Sushi Franchise Corporation (Traditional); Great American Cookies's is GAC FRANCHISING, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

What is the difference between Ace Sushi and Great American Cookies?

Ace Sushi and Great American Cookies are food & beverage franchises from different franchisors (Ace Sushi Franchise Corporation (Traditional) and GAC FRANCHISING, LLC). Ace Sushi is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $18,275 – $117,575, against $340,500 – $462,650 for Great American Cookies. Only Great American Cookies disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $539,902), while Ace Sushi's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Is Ace Sushi more profitable than Great American Cookies?

Only Great American Cookies disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $539,902), while Ace Sushi's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Which is cheaper to open — Ace Sushi or Great American Cookies?

Ace Sushi is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $18,275 – $117,575, against $340,500 – $462,650 for Great American Cookies.

Is Ace Sushi or Great American Cookies growing faster?

Ace Sushi reports 423 franchised outlets, net change +104 in the latest reported year, a 11.3% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Great American Cookies reports 395 franchised outlets, net change -5 in the latest reported year, a 5.8% closure rate (FDD Item 20).

Go deeper on each brand

Ace Sushi franchise facts$18,275 – $117,575 · high risk Great American Cookies franchise facts$340,500 – $462,650 · medium risk

Food & beverage rankings

Best Food & beverage franchises by the FDD numbersCheapest Food & beverage franchises to openFastest-growing Food & beverage franchisesFood & beverage franchises ranked by average revenueFood & beverage franchises with disclosed Item 19 earningsFood & beverage franchises with the most franchisee lawsuitsLowest-churn Food & beverage franchisesLowest-royalty Food & beverage franchises

Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Ace Sushi 2025, Great American Cookies 2025). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.

This report compiles and structures publicly filed Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) data from state franchise registrations. It is not legal, financial, or investment advice, is not affiliated with or endorsed by any franchisor, and does not replace reading the full FDD or consulting a franchise attorney or accountant. All figures are as disclosed by the franchisor in its most recent registered FDD. Item 19 financial performance representations are made at the franchisor’s option and may be absent or limited.