Franchise Facts Report

Franchise Facts Reportcompare → Fci vs TemperaturePro

Fci vs TemperaturePro

Home services · head-to-head from each brand's most recent FDD

Two home services franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.

FciTemperaturePro
Total initial investment
FDD Item 7
$184,000 – $249,000 $402,050 – $439,750
Initial franchise fee
FDD Item 5
$147,500
Royalty
FDD Item 6
5% 6%
Item 19 earnings disclosed
FDD Item 19
Yes Not disclosed
Avg unit revenue (headline)
FDD Item 19
in report
Franchised outlets
FDD Item 20
288 253
Net outlet change (latest yr)
FDD Item 20
+36 -47
Closure rate
FDD Item 20
4% 15.7%
Franchisee lawsuits
FDD Item 3
disclosed 0
Risk level
our read
Medium High
FDD year
registration
2025 2024

Are Fci and TemperaturePro the same company?

No — Fci and TemperaturePro are franchised by separate companies. Fci's franchisor is Floorcoverings International, Ltd.; TemperaturePro's is SystemForward America, LLC a Lousisiana Limited Liability Company (TemperaturePr. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

Cost to open

Fci is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $184,000 – $249,000, against $402,050 – $439,750 for TemperaturePro.

How much does each make? (Item 19)

Only Fci disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation, while TemperaturePro's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Closures & failure rate

Fci reports 288 franchised outlets, net change +36 in the latest reported year, a 4% closure rate (FDD Item 20). TemperaturePro reports 253 franchised outlets, net change -47 in the latest reported year, a 15.7% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against home services medians.

Litigation

Fci discloses litigation in FDD Item 3 (case detail in the full report). TemperaturePro discloses no franchisee-initiated proceedings in FDD Item 3.

The full side-by-side — $249

This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against home services peers.

How the report works

Only looking at one of them?

Fci vs TemperaturePro — frequently asked

Are Fci and TemperaturePro the same company?

No — Fci and TemperaturePro are franchised by separate companies. Fci's franchisor is Floorcoverings International, Ltd.; TemperaturePro's is SystemForward America, LLC a Lousisiana Limited Liability Company (TemperaturePr. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

What is the difference between Fci and TemperaturePro?

Fci and TemperaturePro are home services franchises from different franchisors (Floorcoverings International, Ltd. and SystemForward America, LLC a Lousisiana Limited Liability Company (TemperaturePr). Fci is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $184,000 – $249,000, against $402,050 – $439,750 for TemperaturePro. Only Fci disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation, while TemperaturePro's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Is Fci more profitable than TemperaturePro?

Only Fci disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation, while TemperaturePro's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Which is cheaper to open — Fci or TemperaturePro?

Fci is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $184,000 – $249,000, against $402,050 – $439,750 for TemperaturePro.

Is Fci or TemperaturePro growing faster?

Fci reports 288 franchised outlets, net change +36 in the latest reported year, a 4% closure rate (FDD Item 20). TemperaturePro reports 253 franchised outlets, net change -47 in the latest reported year, a 15.7% closure rate (FDD Item 20).

Go deeper on each brand

Fci franchise facts$184,000 – $249,000 · medium risk TemperaturePro franchise facts$402,050 – $439,750 · high risk

Home services rankings

Best home services & home improvement franchises by the FDD numbersCheapest home services & home improvement franchises to openFastest-growing home services & home improvement franchisesHome services & home improvement franchises ranked by average revenueHome services & home improvement franchises with disclosed Item 19 earningsHome services & home improvement franchises with the most franchisee lawsuitsLowest-churn home services & home improvement franchisesLowest-royalty home services & home improvement franchises

Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Fci 2025, TemperaturePro 2024). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.

This report compiles and structures publicly filed Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) data from state franchise registrations. It is not legal, financial, or investment advice, is not affiliated with or endorsed by any franchisor, and does not replace reading the full FDD or consulting a franchise attorney or accountant. All figures are as disclosed by the franchisor in its most recent registered FDD. Item 19 financial performance representations are made at the franchisor’s option and may be absent or limited.