Franchise Facts Report

Franchise Facts Reportcompare → Mac Tools Division vs Tire Pros

Mac Tools Division vs Tire Pros

Automotive · head-to-head from each brand's most recent FDD

Two automotive franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.

Mac Tools DivisionTire Pros
Total initial investment
FDD Item 7
$121,320 – $344,275 $11,995 – $136,745
Initial franchise fee
FDD Item 5
$8,000 $7,000
Royalty
FDD Item 6
Item 19 earnings disclosed
FDD Item 19
Yes Not disclosed
Avg unit revenue (headline)
FDD Item 19
$11,268,813
Franchised outlets
FDD Item 20
813 644
Net outlet change (latest yr)
FDD Item 20
+41 +21
Closure rate
FDD Item 20
1.6% 17.5%
Franchisee lawsuits
FDD Item 3
13 0
Risk level
our read
Medium Medium
FDD year
registration
2024 2025

Are Mac Tools Division and Tire Pros the same company?

No — Mac Tools Division and Tire Pros are franchised by separate companies. Mac Tools Division's franchisor is Stanley Industrial + Automotive, LLC; Tire Pros's is Tire Pros Francorp, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

Cost to open

Tire Pros is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $11,995 – $136,745, against $121,320 – $344,275 for Mac Tools Division.

How much does each make? (Item 19)

Only Mac Tools Division disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $11,268,813), while Tire Pros's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Closures & failure rate

Mac Tools Division reports 813 franchised outlets, net change +41 in the latest reported year, a 1.6% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Tire Pros reports 644 franchised outlets, net change +21 in the latest reported year, a 17.5% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against automotive medians.

Litigation

Mac Tools Division discloses 13 franchisee-vs-franchisor proceedings in FDD Item 3. Tire Pros discloses no franchisee-initiated proceedings in FDD Item 3.

The full side-by-side — $249

This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against automotive peers.

How the report works

Only looking at one of them?

Mac Tools Division vs Tire Pros — frequently asked

Are Mac Tools Division and Tire Pros the same company?

No — Mac Tools Division and Tire Pros are franchised by separate companies. Mac Tools Division's franchisor is Stanley Industrial + Automotive, LLC; Tire Pros's is Tire Pros Francorp, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

What is the difference between Mac Tools Division and Tire Pros?

Mac Tools Division and Tire Pros are automotive franchises from different franchisors (Stanley Industrial + Automotive, LLC and Tire Pros Francorp, LLC). Tire Pros is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $11,995 – $136,745, against $121,320 – $344,275 for Mac Tools Division. Only Mac Tools Division disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $11,268,813), while Tire Pros's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Is Mac Tools Division more profitable than Tire Pros?

Only Mac Tools Division disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $11,268,813), while Tire Pros's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Which is cheaper to open — Mac Tools Division or Tire Pros?

Tire Pros is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $11,995 – $136,745, against $121,320 – $344,275 for Mac Tools Division.

Is Mac Tools Division or Tire Pros growing faster?

Mac Tools Division reports 813 franchised outlets, net change +41 in the latest reported year, a 1.6% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Tire Pros reports 644 franchised outlets, net change +21 in the latest reported year, a 17.5% closure rate (FDD Item 20).

Go deeper on each brand

Mac Tools Division franchise facts$121,320 – $344,275 · medium risk Tire Pros franchise facts$11,995 – $136,745 · medium risk

Automotive rankings

Automotive franchises ranked by average revenueAutomotive franchises with disclosed Item 19 earningsAutomotive franchises with the most franchisee lawsuitsBest Automotive franchises by the FDD numbersCheapest Automotive franchises to openFastest-growing Automotive franchisesLowest-churn Automotive franchisesLowest-royalty Automotive franchises

Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Mac Tools Division 2024, Tire Pros 2025). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.

This report compiles and structures publicly filed Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) data from state franchise registrations. It is not legal, financial, or investment advice, is not affiliated with or endorsed by any franchisor, and does not replace reading the full FDD or consulting a franchise attorney or accountant. All figures are as disclosed by the franchisor in its most recent registered FDD. Item 19 financial performance representations are made at the franchisor’s option and may be absent or limited.