Franchise Facts Report

Franchise Facts Reportcompare → Kona Ice vs Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness

Kona Ice vs Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness

Food & beverage · head-to-head from each brand's most recent FDD

Two food & beverage franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.

Kona IceRita's Ice-Custard-Happiness
Total initial investment
FDD Item 7
$173,356 – $222,141 $293,233 – $768,992
Initial franchise fee
FDD Item 5
$15,000
Royalty
FDD Item 6
6.5%
Item 19 earnings disclosed
FDD Item 19
Not disclosed Yes
Avg unit revenue (headline)
FDD Item 19
$511,673
Franchised outlets
FDD Item 20
1,670 546
Net outlet change (latest yr)
FDD Item 20
+194 +18
Closure rate
FDD Item 20
0.1%
Franchisee lawsuits
FDD Item 3
0 disclosed
Risk level
our read
Medium Medium
FDD year
registration
2025 2024

Are Kona Ice and Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness the same company?

No — Kona Ice and Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness are franchised by separate companies. Kona Ice's franchisor is Kona Ice, Inc.; Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness's is RITA'S FRANCHISE COMPANY, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

Cost to open

Kona Ice is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $173,356 – $222,141, against $293,233 – $768,992 for Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness.

How much does each make? (Item 19)

Only Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $511,673), while Kona Ice's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Closures & failure rate

Kona Ice reports 1,670 franchised outlets, net change +194 in the latest reported year, a 0.1% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness reports 546 franchised outlets, net change +18 in the latest reported year (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against food & beverage medians.

Litigation

Kona Ice discloses no franchisee-initiated proceedings in FDD Item 3. Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness discloses litigation in FDD Item 3 (case detail in the full report).

The full side-by-side — $249

This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against food & beverage peers.

How the report works

Only looking at one of them?

Kona Ice vs Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness — frequently asked

Are Kona Ice and Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness the same company?

No — Kona Ice and Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness are franchised by separate companies. Kona Ice's franchisor is Kona Ice, Inc.; Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness's is RITA'S FRANCHISE COMPANY, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.

What is the difference between Kona Ice and Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness?

Kona Ice and Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness are food & beverage franchises from different franchisors (Kona Ice, Inc. and RITA'S FRANCHISE COMPANY, LLC). Kona Ice is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $173,356 – $222,141, against $293,233 – $768,992 for Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness. Only Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $511,673), while Kona Ice's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Is Kona Ice more profitable than Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness?

Only Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $511,673), while Kona Ice's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.

Which is cheaper to open — Kona Ice or Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness?

Kona Ice is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $173,356 – $222,141, against $293,233 – $768,992 for Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness.

Is Kona Ice or Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness growing faster?

Kona Ice reports 1,670 franchised outlets, net change +194 in the latest reported year, a 0.1% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness reports 546 franchised outlets, net change +18 in the latest reported year (FDD Item 20).

Go deeper on each brand

Kona Ice franchise facts$173,356 – $222,141 · medium risk Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness franchise facts$293,233 – $768,992 · medium risk

Food & beverage rankings

Best Food & beverage franchises by the FDD numbersCheapest Food & beverage franchises to openFastest-growing Food & beverage franchisesFood & beverage franchises ranked by average revenueFood & beverage franchises with disclosed Item 19 earningsFood & beverage franchises with the most franchisee lawsuitsLowest-churn Food & beverage franchisesLowest-royalty Food & beverage franchises

Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Kona Ice 2025, Rita's Ice-Custard-Happiness 2024). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.

This report compiles and structures publicly filed Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) data from state franchise registrations. It is not legal, financial, or investment advice, is not affiliated with or endorsed by any franchisor, and does not replace reading the full FDD or consulting a franchise attorney or accountant. All figures are as disclosed by the franchisor in its most recent registered FDD. Item 19 financial performance representations are made at the franchisor’s option and may be absent or limited.