Franchise Facts Report → compare → Proforma vs Schooley Mitchell
Proforma vs Schooley Mitchell
Two business services franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.
| Proforma | Schooley Mitchell | |
|---|---|---|
| Total initial investment FDD Item 7 | $7,030 – $27,695 | $70,500 – $80,750 |
| Initial franchise fee FDD Item 5 | — | $250,000 |
| Royalty FDD Item 6 | — | 8% |
| Item 19 earnings disclosed FDD Item 19 | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Avg unit revenue (headline) FDD Item 19 | — | $355,952 |
| Franchised outlets FDD Item 20 | 483 | 227 |
| Net outlet change (latest yr) FDD Item 20 | -13 | +26 |
| Closure rate FDD Item 20 | 1.6% | — |
| Franchisee lawsuits FDD Item 3 | 0 | disclosed |
| Risk level our read | Medium | Medium |
| FDD year registration | 2025 | 2025 |
Are Proforma and Schooley Mitchell the same company?
No — Proforma and Schooley Mitchell are franchised by separate companies. Proforma's franchisor is PFG VENTURES, L.P; Schooley Mitchell's is 1073355 Ontario Limited. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
Cost to open
Proforma is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $7,030 – $27,695, against $70,500 – $80,750 for Schooley Mitchell.
How much does each make? (Item 19)
Only Schooley Mitchell disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $355,952), while Proforma's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Closures & failure rate
Proforma reports 483 franchised outlets, net change -13 in the latest reported year, a 1.6% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Schooley Mitchell reports 227 franchised outlets, net change +26 in the latest reported year (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against business services medians.
Litigation
Proforma discloses no franchisee-initiated proceedings in FDD Item 3. Schooley Mitchell discloses litigation in FDD Item 3 (case detail in the full report).
This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against business services peers.
Only looking at one of them?
Proforma vs Schooley Mitchell — frequently asked
Are Proforma and Schooley Mitchell the same company?
No — Proforma and Schooley Mitchell are franchised by separate companies. Proforma's franchisor is PFG VENTURES, L.P; Schooley Mitchell's is 1073355 Ontario Limited. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
What is the difference between Proforma and Schooley Mitchell?
Proforma and Schooley Mitchell are business services franchises from different franchisors (PFG VENTURES, L.P and 1073355 Ontario Limited). Proforma is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $7,030 – $27,695, against $70,500 – $80,750 for Schooley Mitchell. Only Schooley Mitchell disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $355,952), while Proforma's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Is Proforma more profitable than Schooley Mitchell?
Only Schooley Mitchell disclosed earnings: it makes an Item 19 financial performance representation (headline average unit revenue $355,952), while Proforma's most recent FDD makes none. That asymmetry is itself a data point: one franchisor puts its unit economics on paper, the other doesn't.
Which is cheaper to open — Proforma or Schooley Mitchell?
Proforma is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $7,030 – $27,695, against $70,500 – $80,750 for Schooley Mitchell.
Is Proforma or Schooley Mitchell growing faster?
Proforma reports 483 franchised outlets, net change -13 in the latest reported year, a 1.6% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Schooley Mitchell reports 227 franchised outlets, net change +26 in the latest reported year (FDD Item 20).
Go deeper on each brand
Business services rankings
Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Proforma 2025, Schooley Mitchell 2025). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.