Franchise Facts Report → compare → Signarama | Sign-A-Rama vs EOS Worldwide
Signarama | Sign-A-Rama vs EOS Worldwide
Two business services franchises, compared on the numbers their own Franchise Disclosure Documents put on record — investment, fees, Item 19 earnings, outlet churn, and litigation. Not marketing copy.
| Signarama | Sign-A-Rama | EOS Worldwide | |
|---|---|---|
| Total initial investment FDD Item 7 | $120,205 – $339,971 | $44,695 – $146,110 |
| Initial franchise fee FDD Item 5 | $49,500 | — |
| Royalty FDD Item 6 | 4% | — |
| Item 19 earnings disclosed FDD Item 19 | Yes | Yes |
| Avg unit revenue (headline) FDD Item 19 | in report | in report |
| Franchised outlets FDD Item 20 | 673 | 662 |
| Net outlet change (latest yr) FDD Item 20 | +4 | +137 |
| Closure rate FDD Item 20 | 2.2% | 1.1% |
| Franchisee lawsuits FDD Item 3 | disclosed | 0 |
| Risk level our read | Medium | Low |
| FDD year registration | 2024 | 2024 |
Are Signarama | Sign-A-Rama and EOS Worldwide the same company?
No — Signarama | Sign-A-Rama and EOS Worldwide are franchised by separate companies. Signarama | Sign-A-Rama's franchisor is SignARama Inc.; EOS Worldwide's is EOS Worldwide Franchising, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
Cost to open
EOS Worldwide is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $44,695 – $146,110, against $120,205 – $339,971 for Signarama | Sign-A-Rama.
How much does each make? (Item 19)
Both franchisors make an Item 19 financial performance representation — the detailed figures are in each brand's FDD and in the full report.
Closures & failure rate
Signarama | Sign-A-Rama reports 673 franchised outlets, net change +4 in the latest reported year, a 2.2% closure rate (FDD Item 20). EOS Worldwide reports 662 franchised outlets, net change +137 in the latest reported year, a 1.1% closure rate (FDD Item 20). Outlet churn — closures, terminations, non-renewals — is the closest thing an FDD has to a failure rate; the full report puts both brands' churn against business services medians.
Litigation
Signarama | Sign-A-Rama discloses litigation in FDD Item 3 (case detail in the full report). EOS Worldwide discloses no franchisee-initiated proceedings in FDD Item 3.
This page is the headline numbers. The Deep report compares up to three brands on the complete FDD record — every fee line, the actual Item 19 figures and what they represent, each lawsuit, and churn benchmarked against business services peers.
Only looking at one of them?
Signarama | Sign-A-Rama vs EOS Worldwide — frequently asked
Are Signarama | Sign-A-Rama and EOS Worldwide the same company?
No — Signarama | Sign-A-Rama and EOS Worldwide are franchised by separate companies. Signarama | Sign-A-Rama's franchisor is SignARama Inc.; EOS Worldwide's is EOS Worldwide Franchising, LLC. Each registers and files its own Franchise Disclosure Document, and you would be signing with a different entity depending on which you chose. Note that a registry filing names the franchisor, not necessarily its ultimate parent — two brands owned by the same parent company can still have separate franchisors.
What is the difference between Signarama | Sign-A-Rama and EOS Worldwide?
Signarama | Sign-A-Rama and EOS Worldwide are business services franchises from different franchisors (SignARama Inc. and EOS Worldwide Franchising, LLC). EOS Worldwide is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $44,695 – $146,110, against $120,205 – $339,971 for Signarama | Sign-A-Rama. Both franchisors make an Item 19 financial performance representation — the detailed figures are in each brand's FDD and in the full report.
Is Signarama | Sign-A-Rama more profitable than EOS Worldwide?
Both franchisors make an Item 19 financial performance representation — the detailed figures are in each brand's FDD and in the full report.
Which is cheaper to open — Signarama | Sign-A-Rama or EOS Worldwide?
EOS Worldwide is the cheaper franchise to open: its FDD Item 7 puts the total initial investment at $44,695 – $146,110, against $120,205 – $339,971 for Signarama | Sign-A-Rama.
Is Signarama | Sign-A-Rama or EOS Worldwide growing faster?
Signarama | Sign-A-Rama reports 673 franchised outlets, net change +4 in the latest reported year, a 2.2% closure rate (FDD Item 20). EOS Worldwide reports 662 franchised outlets, net change +137 in the latest reported year, a 1.1% closure rate (FDD Item 20).
Go deeper on each brand
Business services rankings
Figures are as disclosed in each brand's most recent registered FDD (Signarama | Sign-A-Rama 2024, EOS Worldwide 2024). “—” means the FDD does not disclose it or the table did not parse cleanly — never an estimate.